eCD Future Enhancements

Future Enhancements

NU-RES welcomes your feedback about how we can, together, improve eCD system.

See below the list of suggested improvements.

ApplicationSuggestionProblem it SolvesStatusPriorityComments
eCDIn email being generated to the Discloser by the system, it should dynamically show the status change (e.g. Status: Review complete)Improves communicationCompleted October 20191 – Low
eCDeCD Discloser to delete uploaded attachmentsImproves record accuracyUnder review1 – LowUCO Reviewer can send back to discloser if Discloser uploaded incorrect attachment; Discloser should be able to delete; SA should be able to delete at any stop, with comment/audit trail that they deleted/reason
eCDAbility to save private comments between UCO Reviewers and Power UsersImprove internal communicationNot completed1 – LowTo maintain transparency, all communication in eCD is viewable by those that have a role in the record; private comments between users should occur outside of the system
eCDAppend the email generated by the system with the signature of the logged-in userUtilize email standards improves communicationUnder review1 – LowSender is listed in the dynamic text of the email
eCDDownload to Excel details of all submitted disclosures so as to segregate each college’s data and determine types of research happening, consulting, etc., as well as provide to Deans for their reviewSegregate each college’s data, determine relationship and research types, and provide to Deans for reviewCompleted May 20201 – Low
eCDAbility for eCD Discloser to recall a submitted disclosure that has not yet been assigned to a UCO Reviewer for reviewAllows for updates to disclosure after submission to UCO Reviewer in workflowCompleted April 20191 – LowAs long as no UCO Reviewer has assigned the disclosure, ok to recall; if assigned, recall is not allowed.
eCDReports as defined by Compliance OfficeImprove ability to assess data and make informed decisionsUnder review1 – Low
eCDAbility for UCO Reviewer to delete a file they uploaded to a disclosure; SA should be able to delete any file uploadedImproves accuracy of the recordUnder review2 – MediumAny one with a role on the record should be able to delete attachments they uploaded when the record is at their stop; SA should be able to delete at any stop, with comment/audit trail that they deleted/reason
eCDAbility to assign review to another reviewer (like in eCLAWs)More efficient process then having to email the other reviewer to ask them to assign it to themselvesCompleted February 20222 – MediumInitial Reviewer triages and either closes ‘no further action’ or needs to assign to another reviewer in the same pool
eCDIndicator on discloser list for Power User of users in the cycle who have changed to Inactive status after list is generatedAllows for easy identification of users in the cycle that have left NUCompleted February 20222 – MediumResearch concern re: if PI has project, even if they leave, some review is required even if PI doesn’t complete it….can’t bill Gov’t if PI is not in compliance (e.g. did not complete their disclosure). Needs further discussion with Compliance
eCDGive the Power User the ability to designate which response to a question will flag as a possible conflict in a potential conflicts column when building the annual disclosure cycleCurrently, a YES answer to a Y/N type question triggers a flag of ‘potential conflict’ but since there are different types of questions, there is no way to consistently flag an answer to a question as a potential conflict. This would solve that problem and make it easier for reviewer to identify potential issuesCompleted February 20242 – MediumRemove the automatic trigger of a “Potential Conflict” flag from Y answers to Y/N questions, and allow the Power User to designate which answer will trigger the “Potential Conflict” flag, if any, in all question types
eCDInclude email address of discloser when exporting list for UCO ReviewerProvides the UCO Reviewer the contact info of the disclosers in the downloaded file for ease of contact/escalationCompleted February 20222 – MediumMany users do not respond to Info Requests in eCD; alternative communication option
eCDReviewers tool to add comments without closing out disclosure that follow the person; Notes viewable in left menu column; Ability to flag/tag responses to questions (potential issues) and later be able to search/ sort/filter by the tags/flags; Should contain text field for comments and a separate single text field to add a flag for sorting/filteringAllows UCO Reviewers to collect comments on a users disclosure year to year, and all comments remain accessible; ability to apply custom flags and search for users with those flags makes it easy to identify particular issues and particular disclosersUnder review2 – MediumAny notes regarding a discloser that the UCO Reviewer makes in the record should follow the person from year to year…UCO Reviewer should be able to easily add comments at any time to the Persons Notes file (when opening a persons disclosure, on the left frame, have a link to “Comments” which the UCO Reviewer can continuously add comments and they stay with the person’s file year to year);
eCDAbility for UCO Reviewers to tag an entire disclosure ‘on the fly’ with custom tagsAllow UCO Reviewers to create/apply a custom tag on a disclosureUnder review1 – LowAbility to add a “tag” to a disclosure (UCO Reviewer can configure on the fly an issue type, e.g. “need CMAP” or “Q12 issue” ) They don’t want a preset list to choose from, but the ability to configure on the fly
eCDUCO Reviewer to have additional option of “Closed-Not Reviewed”Need to be able to resolve disclosures that were started but are unfinished because of some legitimate reason (e.g. person left NU or is on extended medical leave, etc.)Under review2 – MediumNeed new status’: Draft-Closed not Submitted; Returned-Closed not Reviewed (these 2 status’ gets to the 100% resolved)…need to be able to search by this status
eCDSub-Status to the dashboard (just like eCLAWs)Improves communication and transparencyCompleted January 20223 – HighSubstatus is only applicable when record is at UCO Reviewer stop; show Substatus in “Status” column instead of overall status of “Pending UCO Review” when a Sub Status is set at UCO Reviewer stop
eCDIn any of a Person’s eCD disclosures, under “Information Requests” on the left frame, have a section for All Disclosures with a + and then have it fan open to show a list of all disclosuresProvides the UCO Reviewer a full view of all disclosures to see patterns/paths/related issuesUnder review2 – MediumWhen “plus” selected, show a list of links of all of the person’s disclosures (which are saved in the person’s profile);
eCDReview function of CMAP; currently CMAP can be uploaded to person’s disclosure, but process happens outside of eCD – College Designated COI Reviewer has no approval function in eCD route – communication happens in email or Info Request – Possible ‘Add Reviewer on the fly” to the workflow approval routeImproves the process of CMAP and brings the process into the systemUnder review1 – LowChanges in CMAP’s should trigger an off-cycle disclosure, and the changed CMAP uploaded to the new disclosure; original CMAP stays with original disclosure
eCDNested questions in questionnaire (like in eCLAWs)Would improve the usability of the applicationCompleted February 20233 – HighLike eCLAWS, want to nest a question under another question with a Yes/No or Yes/No with comment answer type; allow Power user to select which answer triggers the nested question
eCDGrant a default role of eCD Discloser to all FacultyWould allow users at anytime to complete an off-cycle disclosure without having to ask NU-RES Help Center for an eCD Discloser roleCompleted September 20221 – LowSystem would have to differentiate between those that are required to disclose from those who are not required; Research disclosers are treated differently than university disclosure requirements;

Last Updated on June 6, 2025