eCD Future Enhancements
Future Enhancements
NU-RES welcomes your feedback about how we can, together, improve eCD system.
See below the list of suggested improvements.
Application | Suggestion | Problem it Solves | Status | Priority | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
eCD | In email being generated to the Discloser by the system, it should dynamically show the status change (e.g. Status: Review complete) | Improves communication | Completed October 2019 | 1 – Low | |
eCD | eCD Discloser to delete uploaded attachments | Improves record accuracy | Under review | 1 – Low | UCO Reviewer can send back to discloser if Discloser uploaded incorrect attachment; Discloser should be able to delete; SA should be able to delete at any stop, with comment/audit trail that they deleted/reason |
eCD | Ability to save private comments between UCO Reviewers and Power Users | Improve internal communication | Not completed | 1 – Low | To maintain transparency, all communication in eCD is viewable by those that have a role in the record; private comments between users should occur outside of the system |
eCD | Append the email generated by the system with the signature of the logged-in user | Utilize email standards improves communication | Under review | 1 – Low | Sender is listed in the dynamic text of the email |
eCD | Download to Excel details of all submitted disclosures so as to segregate each college’s data and determine types of research happening, consulting, etc., as well as provide to Deans for their review | Segregate each college’s data, determine relationship and research types, and provide to Deans for review | Completed May 2020 | 1 – Low | |
eCD | Ability for eCD Discloser to recall a submitted disclosure that has not yet been assigned to a UCO Reviewer for review | Allows for updates to disclosure after submission to UCO Reviewer in workflow | Completed April 2019 | 1 – Low | As long as no UCO Reviewer has assigned the disclosure, ok to recall; if assigned, recall is not allowed. |
eCD | Reports as defined by Compliance Office | Improve ability to assess data and make informed decisions | Under review | 1 – Low | |
eCD | Ability for UCO Reviewer to delete a file they uploaded to a disclosure; SA should be able to delete any file uploaded | Improves accuracy of the record | Under review | 2 – Medium | Any one with a role on the record should be able to delete attachments they uploaded when the record is at their stop; SA should be able to delete at any stop, with comment/audit trail that they deleted/reason |
eCD | Ability to assign review to another reviewer (like in eCLAWs) | More efficient process then having to email the other reviewer to ask them to assign it to themselves | Completed February 2022 | 2 – Medium | Initial Reviewer triages and either closes ‘no further action’ or needs to assign to another reviewer in the same pool |
eCD | Indicator on discloser list for Power User of users in the cycle who have changed to Inactive status after list is generated | Allows for easy identification of users in the cycle that have left NU | Completed February 2022 | 2 – Medium | Research concern re: if PI has project, even if they leave, some review is required even if PI doesn’t complete it….can’t bill Gov’t if PI is not in compliance (e.g. did not complete their disclosure). Needs further discussion with Compliance |
eCD | Give the Power User the ability to designate which response to a question will flag as a possible conflict in a potential conflicts column when building the annual disclosure cycle | Currently, a YES answer to a Y/N type question triggers a flag of ‘potential conflict’ but since there are different types of questions, there is no way to consistently flag an answer to a question as a potential conflict. This would solve that problem and make it easier for reviewer to identify potential issues | Completed February 2024 | 2 – Medium | Remove the automatic trigger of a “Potential Conflict” flag from Y answers to Y/N questions, and allow the Power User to designate which answer will trigger the “Potential Conflict” flag, if any, in all question types |
eCD | Include email address of discloser when exporting list for UCO Reviewer | Provides the UCO Reviewer the contact info of the disclosers in the downloaded file for ease of contact/escalation | Completed February 2022 | 2 – Medium | Many users do not respond to Info Requests in eCD; alternative communication option |
eCD | Reviewers tool to add comments without closing out disclosure that follow the person; Notes viewable in left menu column; Ability to flag/tag responses to questions (potential issues) and later be able to search/ sort/filter by the tags/flags; Should contain text field for comments and a separate single text field to add a flag for sorting/filtering | Allows UCO Reviewers to collect comments on a users disclosure year to year, and all comments remain accessible; ability to apply custom flags and search for users with those flags makes it easy to identify particular issues and particular disclosers | Under review | 2 – Medium | Any notes regarding a discloser that the UCO Reviewer makes in the record should follow the person from year to year…UCO Reviewer should be able to easily add comments at any time to the Persons Notes file (when opening a persons disclosure, on the left frame, have a link to “Comments” which the UCO Reviewer can continuously add comments and they stay with the person’s file year to year); |
eCD | Ability for UCO Reviewers to tag an entire disclosure ‘on the fly’ with custom tags | Allow UCO Reviewers to create/apply a custom tag on a disclosure | Under review | 1 – Low | Ability to add a “tag” to a disclosure (UCO Reviewer can configure on the fly an issue type, e.g. “need CMAP” or “Q12 issue” ) They don’t want a preset list to choose from, but the ability to configure on the fly |
eCD | UCO Reviewer to have additional option of “Closed-Not Reviewed” | Need to be able to resolve disclosures that were started but are unfinished because of some legitimate reason (e.g. person left NU or is on extended medical leave, etc.) | Under review | 2 – Medium | Need new status’: Draft-Closed not Submitted; Returned-Closed not Reviewed (these 2 status’ gets to the 100% resolved)…need to be able to search by this status |
eCD | Sub-Status to the dashboard (just like eCLAWs) | Improves communication and transparency | Completed January 2022 | 3 – High | Substatus is only applicable when record is at UCO Reviewer stop; show Substatus in “Status” column instead of overall status of “Pending UCO Review” when a Sub Status is set at UCO Reviewer stop |
eCD | In any of a Person’s eCD disclosures, under “Information Requests” on the left frame, have a section for All Disclosures with a + and then have it fan open to show a list of all disclosures | Provides the UCO Reviewer a full view of all disclosures to see patterns/paths/related issues | Under review | 2 – Medium | When “plus” selected, show a list of links of all of the person’s disclosures (which are saved in the person’s profile); |
eCD | Review function of CMAP; currently CMAP can be uploaded to person’s disclosure, but process happens outside of eCD – College Designated COI Reviewer has no approval function in eCD route – communication happens in email or Info Request – Possible ‘Add Reviewer on the fly” to the workflow approval route | Improves the process of CMAP and brings the process into the system | Under review | 1 – Low | Changes in CMAP’s should trigger an off-cycle disclosure, and the changed CMAP uploaded to the new disclosure; original CMAP stays with original disclosure |
eCD | Nested questions in questionnaire (like in eCLAWs) | Would improve the usability of the application | Completed February 2023 | 3 – High | Like eCLAWS, want to nest a question under another question with a Yes/No or Yes/No with comment answer type; allow Power user to select which answer triggers the nested question |
eCD | Grant a default role of eCD Discloser to all Faculty | Would allow users at anytime to complete an off-cycle disclosure without having to ask NU-RES Help Center for an eCD Discloser role | Completed September 2022 | 1 – Low | System would have to differentiate between those that are required to disclose from those who are not required; Research disclosers are treated differently than university disclosure requirements; |
Last Updated on June 6, 2025